Belmont's Curse Devs Explain Why It's Not Dark Souls or Dead…

This insight shows how important it is for developers to stay true to a franchise's core identity, even when experimenting with popular genres. For players, it means Belmont's Curse delivers the class…

This insight shows how important it is for developers to stay true to a franchise's core identity, even when experimenting with popular genres. For players, it means Belmont's Curse delivers the class…

Key points - Evil Empire head Ben Laulan revealed Belmont's Curse had multiple iterations during development. - Early versions were slower and more like Dark Souls, but were deemed too slow and hard. - A faster version felt too much like Dead Cells, lacking necessary exploration. - The final game launched to critical acclaim, including a 4/5 review from this site. - The producer said the game was born out of urgency to avoid a 10-year wait for the next entry.

Timeline - During development: Evil Empire experiments with a slower, Dark Souls-like combat system. - After realizing it was too slow: They increase speed, but the game becomes too similar to Dead Cells. - Final iteration: They strike a balance, creating a fast-paced Castlevania with exploration. - Release: Castlevania: Belmont's Curse launches to critical acclaim.

FAQ

Q: What was the original direction for Belmont's Curse? A: It was initially much slower with heavy combat, similar to Dark Souls, but the team felt it didn't fit Castlevania.

Q: Why did they avoid a Dead Cells style? A: The faster version lacked the exploration essential to Castlevania, so they dialed it back to find a balance.

Q: How did the game perform critically? A: It received critical acclaim, including a 4/5 star review praising its gothic world and fast-paced action.